It’s March, that means it’s time for a new Disney Movie of the Month. In January I looked at Aladdin
– an Animated Classic – and in February I looked at A Bugs Life – a Pixar movie. So for the third Disney Movie of the
Month it seemed like it was time to look at a live action movie and I chose
2014’s Maleficent.
Maleficent was
released back in 2014 and is the live action reimagining of the 1959 animated Sleeping Beauty. Angelina Jolie plays
the titular character who is given a more sympathetic backstory in this darker
take on the original film. Maleficent is one of my favourite villains – more on
that in a follow up post later this month. I originally saw Maleficent in the cinema about a week
after it was released and yet I haven’t watched it since then. Until today.
I’d forgotten just how strong Angelina Jolie’s performance
as Maleficent is. She clearly relished playing the moments when the story
requires her to be a slightly camp arch villain, but she’s also faultless when
required to convey some very strong emotion material. I was very pleased to
rediscover just how wonderful Angelina Jolie’s performance was.
Maleficent is not
a regular adaption of Sleeping Beauty,
it is very much its own thing. It has moments for Disney fans to spot that
reference the original – such as the forest of thorns, the speech when
Maleficent curses Aurora and the dragon. But it also rejects a lot of the
tropes of the Disney Princess format and I stronger because of that. However at
times it also has a loyalty to the source material that can get in the way of the
films full potential. For example Maleficent
gives us an infuriating take on the three good fairies who are absolutely
useless. As well as trying to shoehorn Prince Phillip into the story for
literally no other reason than he’s supposed to be there. The movie could have
been much stronger if Phillip and the three good fairies were just completely
cut out of it.
I can’t really write about Maleficent without mentioning that there’s definitely some
similarities with Wicked. Both movies
take a green skinned villain from a popular fairy-tale and retell her story to
make her a more sympathetic and feminist character. However they are both very
different stories. I think Wicked may
have partially been an inspiration for Maleficent,
but I don’t think that Maleficent is
a rip off of Wicked.
Part of the appeal of these live action remakes for me is
seeing the way that Disney brings the animated original to life. I like that
despite many changes elsewhere the design team chose to keep Maleficent’s look more
or less the same. In the case of the original Sleeping Beauty the movie has a strong medieval aesthetic, when
adapting it for live action the production team chose a cool dark gothic style
that I think really suits the movie.
Another more technical thing that I love about this movie is
the structure of the story. The pivotal moment in the story of Sleeping Beauty is when the dark fairy
(Maleficent herself) curses the infant princess. The entire story hinges on
that moment. So when it came to telling the story of Sleeping Beauty from the villain’s perspective Disney decided to
restructure the narrative so that act one is building up to why Maleficent places the curse on Aurora and how
she becomes the ‘Mistress of All Evil!’ And then act two of the movie deals
with redeeming her, as Maleficent faces the consequences of her actions. This
structure would actually work well if Disney ever wanted to do a stage adaptation
of Maleficent!
In conclusion, Maleficent
is definitely worth watching. It’s not an adaptation of the 1959 Sleeping Beauty, it is an interesting
alternate take on a well-known story that shifts the focus onto the villain and
makes her a tragic hero.
No comments:
Post a Comment