Maleficent and Beauty and the Beast

Maleficent is the Disney Movie of the Month. The live-action Beauty and the Beast is out now. It was inevitable that I wrote a post about these two movies!

I’ve previously talked about my feelings on Disney’s live-action remakes. I think that if they’re done well then it’s a great idea. As I said in my initial post, I enjoyed Maleficent and as I briefly mentioned in my post about what’s been happening lately that I really liked the new Beauty and the Beast.

Beauty and the Beast represents something new for Disney’s live action remakes in that it is the first one which is a musical. However it’s interesting that – as my friends and I were saying afterwards - the way the songs were arranged and presented in Beauty and the Beast felt more like a stage musical than a traditional Disney musical. I also mentioned in my post on Maleficent that I felt the structure was quite play-like. It’s interesting how live action is bringing out such a strong element of theatricality in these stories.

Maleficent and Beauty and the Beast both have really compelling protagonists. Angelina Jolie was great as Maleficent, her performance really delivered on all the emotional notes that were needed to turn a villain into a sympathetic character. But she was also excellent at the moments of camp arch villainy. Emma Watson delivered a wonderful performance as Belle. She felt truly believable as an intelligent young woman who wants more out of life.

One thing that real stands out and impresses me about both of these movies is the quality of the CGI. Obviously because Disney is such a big company they can afford really good CGI but that doesn’t make the visual effects any less impressive. From dragons and vast fairy-tale landscapes to the Beast and the enchanted objects, realisation of the CGI elements and the blending of live-action and CGI in both films is amazing. They really do a good job of bringing the most fantastical elements of the hand drawn animations to life.

Another thing that really stands out for both these movies - and this also applies to Cinderella - is that they have a really strong look. The fairy-tale world that is being realised on screen has a distinctive aesthetic and is really engaging for the viewer to watch. I hope this trend of the live action remakes being visual treats is one that is going to continue for as long as Disney keep remaking their archive.

I feel that in doing Beauty and the Beast Disney has learnt a big lesson from Maleficent.  One of my biggest problems with Maleficent was its loyalty the source material which lead to the inclusion of Prince Phillip and the Three Good Fairies who really were not needed.  If you’re going to include things because they were there in the original then just make sure they’re needed. Beauty and the Beast certainly managed this, it didn’t feel like anyone or anything was superfluous.

Basically Beauty and the Beast and Maleficent are both very enjoyable movies and I like both of them. They’re tonally very different but that works for the different stories that they’re trying to tell. Disney are showing no signs of stopping on the remakes but if they can keep up the good work then I’m not worried.

Give Ghostbusters 2016 a Chance

Who ya gonna call? Well I’m going to be calling the 2016 Ghostbusting team.

So it’s probably safe to say that the new Ghostbusters was the most decisive movie of 2016 and today marks the DVD’s UK release. This is my (spoiler free) opinion of why you should give the 2016 Ghostbusters a chance.

It’s actually a genuinely funny movie. I saw it originally in the cinema with my Dad and both of us laughed throughout the movie. Not all the jokes work but they come quick enough that if one misses it doesn’t matter. I was also very pleasantly surprised that it completely avoided making sexist, racist or sizeist jokes at the expense of the cast.

Women in science. We all know women are underrepresented in STEM careers, according to the Guardian in 2014 women made up ‘just 12.8% of the Stem workforce’. Obviously a movie is not going to change this but a successful movie with 3 of its female leads specialising in STEM provides exposure and representation that in the long run may influence a generation of women to pursue STEM.

The original Ghostbusters approve of it. According to repeated social media trolls, one reason why the new Ghostbusters was destroying the legacy of the original movies. I find this ironic given the original cast - from Bill Murray to Sigourney Weaver – cameo in the new movie.

It’s accessible for everyone. I went into the cinema with very little knowledge of the original Ghostbusters movies and I enjoyed it. There’s no need to have an in depth knowledge of what went before but if you are an uber Ghostbusters fan then there’s enough references to the originals to appeal to you.

The hope for a second outing for the new Ghostbusters team now solely rests upon DVD sales, streaming and downloads. I hope enough people pay to watch it that Sony is convinced that a sequel would be profitable.